Wal-Mart IS the New Economy

When I was much less fortunate I knew this to be true but lost sight of it as my circumstances improved during the 90s – the ‘new economy’ is the ‘service economy’ according to this USAToday article – Wal-Mart, not high tech, defines ‘New Economy’. My personal experience refutes this. As does most of the internet elite that are out here in the blogosphere. But that is because many of us are the creators of technology – not simply the users. Amoungst my friends, my old peers, I stand out as being abnormally blessed. In such a way that I know at anyone time it can just vanish. Very, very few people improved their lively hoods in the 90s (and the 80s for that matter), that weren’t already on a path up and up. I worked hard, I studied hard, and found mentors that taught me the ropes along the way. But looking at it in hindsight just blows me away… how did I get here? Every statistical fact says it shouldn’t have happened and for many I know it certainly hasn’t. The census numbers bear that out.

You know one of the major things I remember of the 90s was tons of tech schools luring in people looking for middle class lifestyles with promises of ‘learn Microsoft Word and have a career’.

I had arguments – yes arguments – with a few friends tell them that those advertisements were outright lies and bullshit.

It was like a mantra – ‘you must learn not to use Microsoft Word – but to create it – in order to earn a career.’

When I made the risky decision to go to tech school myself, I already knew this to be true. In this field it is the creators that earn the money. So I took up a course in client server programming at Chubb and the rest is history. Course selection was all important. I chose a technology course that enabled me to become a tools builder. A creator.

This is true unless you are using the technology to find efficiencies in your business. Read that to mean lay-offs to your aveage Joe. That payoff is occuring now. Reading the news American productivity is higher then it’s ever been. Most definately due to technology. And now the unemployment rate is rising back to pre-90s levels. Wal-Mart is the greatest example of that success.

My first developer positions were in non-Media corporate America. Retail and services. The tools I built helped those coporations save millions of dollars. In many cases, those dollars were saved by laying off staff that were no longer needed. Truth of the matter is – these jobs far outnumber the kind that I currently have.

I now work in media. I turned down higher paying offers for this. I’m a creator building tools for other creators. It’s a very important distinction. It is a different ball game. Looking at the current state of blogging – it is heartening to see how technology is helping many tech illiterate folk create compelling and interesting products – their sites – that bring people back again and again. I salute those who’ve built MovableType, Manila/Radio, and Blogger. You’ve done a great public service. It’s very very difficult to create tools for creative people. Your highs and your lows are extremely dramatic. When people complement you – it’s huge. And when people criticize you – it’s huge. Because your users are creators themselves.

Content Publishing Systems Squash News Design

Steve Outing – Content Publishing Systems Squash News Design Do a little research next time. It’s not the technology in our case – but it’s implementation. To be fair – some systems do squash design. Post-Nuke for example. You need to be a programmer to change the design of a Post-Nuke site. But many, many, do not. Including what I’m using here at paradox1x.

Going to be buying our first house

A really big deal as far as I’m concerned. I haven’t lived in a family owned house since I was five years old. It was difficult to overcome many internal impulses not to go forward. Impulses I’m sure that are embedded in me from my background growing up.

But here we go 🙂 Just signed the first series of papers last night. What a weird thought…. owning a house!

How to beat the record labels on the Web

CNET – How to beat the record labels on the Web

The answer lies in controlling the rights to recordings. It’s only after start-ups get into the game of signing artists that they will truly be able to control the destiny of downstream distribution. This is no easy task. Record companies have spent decades building up a sourcing system, and have a huge competitive advantage when it comes to expertise in promotion and marketing.

But the majors have huge vulnerabilities when it comes to their cost structures, and the amount of units they need to sell to break even on a title. And, as in all instances where sleeping giants get unseated, it will happen first at the fringes.

There is a long history of small labels making inroads into overlooked genres, and while these independent efforts have historically grown up to be fodder for major acquisitions, it won’t be long before a burgeoning independent makes better strategic use of distribution technology. Often, one loose brick can bring down the whole wall.

So my advice to the plethora of music start-ups focused on distribution? Give it up.

If ya can’t beat ’em… join ’em