Did we help?

This is a tough post to write, tough because I am calling into question the actions not only of the media, but of ourselves, in producing a blogswarm to confront the media’s bias in it’s coverage of Latoyia Figueroa versus Natalee Halloway.

Natalee Halloway, white, blond, missing teen in Aruba. A story a major portion of the public can relate to. A story that sends fear in the hearts of parents across the country. Her plight, along with other notable white girls and women who have gone missing, has been all over the news. Developments have been few. But reports have been many. So how much of this reporting offers us “news”? Is there a responsibility for those who portend to bring us journalism while delivering the news? Or is their job to report to us what we want – driven by the voyeuristic instincts that are possibly inside us all – and be rewarded with high ratings?

Anderson Cooper of CNN shockingly almost came out and said as much. A real mind blower considering that CNN is as guilty of this as anyone else. Still a refreshing thing to hear from someone so watched.

Latoyia Figueroa, young, beautiful, pregnant, and…. black… went missing for nine days before Richard Cranium and The All Spin Zone kicked up a blogswarm by publicizing his letter to CNN. It was blunt. It was honest. It inspired bloggers all around Philadelphia to spread the word about Latoyia Figueroa and decry the obvious bias our “news” corporations deliver us. Philly Future played a role in urging folks to get involved. Notably, when SpinDentist, of the All Spin Zone appeared on The Situation With Carlson Tucker he pretty much got Tucker to admit that television news seeks to provide its audience with what it wants – over what it should. Read the transcript – Tucker tried to shape the discussion into one of right vs left instead of press vs ratings and SpinDentist cornered him to say the truth.

The national press responded with coverage of Latoyia Figueroa. And with the increased light – so did our police department – moving the case to the homicide unit so that it had increased resources devoted to it.

Jay Rosen in a recent thought provoking piece at Press Think “Things I Used to Teach That I No Longer Believe” said recently that “For many years I taught in my criticism classes that pointing out bias in the news media was an important, interesting, and even subversive activity. At the very least an intellectual challenge. Now it is virtually meaningless. Media bias is a proxy in countless political fights and the culture war. It’s effectiveness as a corrective is virtually zero.”.

I had to challenge that assertion in his comments thread. After all, this case proves otherwise, but Jay said something that, for a moment, struck me hard: The example you gave of a similar crime the news media isn’t looking into because the victim isn’t a white girl may have been effective, and necessary, and even just, but in making your points did you also say that these kinds of stories, when television news gets ahold of them, are overdone and manipulative no matter what the race of the victim (they exploit the suffering of the families, so as to bring the audience in on the drama) and we should have less of them? That’s what I mean by truth-seeking.

In my criticism of the press, nor in the many others have I read, is this point made: These stories – when television gets a hold of them, can be overdone and manipulative – no matter the race of the victim. They exploit – for ratings – the suffering of families – to bring audience to the drama. There’s a lot of undeniable truth to this.

But there is a bug in me I can’t shake – I can’t help but think that it should not discourage us from trying to do the right thing.

The fact is – here we are. The press – was moved to possibly its better instincts. The All Spin Zone shares with us another example with Bob Costas refusing to host a Larry King segment because it was exploitive. Just the other day Jack Cafferty at CNN confronts Wolf Blitzer on the BTK Killer coverage accusing it of the same.

Maybe something is afoot? We can only hope. Maybe John Stewart’s appearance on Crossfire has had a longer tail then most folks realize. Maybe blogs do have a role in helping shed light on journalists who have lost their way by seeking ratings over substance and on topics that have gotten lost in the noise.

Take, for example, the Be A Witness campaign. An empowered, participatory media – meaning *us* – has a responsibility to each other – to our communities – to the world at large – to speak out. It is not a worthless excercise to try.

It never is.

The other thing I know is that there is a role for blogs in spreading public service news. The All Spin Zone exemplified it and we hope to build a system that will empower blog publishers to take some screen real estate and devote it to them – first with our Missing Persons Network. There are many people in need – not just the young and pretty. And who knows what we can do if we try?

My thoughts again go out to Latoyia Figueroa, her family, and to all suffering similar tragedy.

Forget sharing photos – share videos

Participants in this week’s Cindy Sheehan vigil are posting videos to YouTube.com. I missed making a vigil myself, but peace is in my prayers.

YouTube joins OurMedia, NowPublic, Flickr and every blog in existance, as powerful tools for participatory, on demand media. The technological barriers of entry have fallen, one by one, for publishing text, then pictures, then audio, and now video, to the entire world – from your desktop.

Participatory on demand media – it’s time has come.

Flash vs Ajax

I am working on a module I can use at sites like Philly Future, or here, that displays a random quote from an XML document.

Admittedly I am not an expert at either Flash or Ajax, but I figure this basic module can be built quickly in both for comparison. I’m just about finished with the Flash version and will use it here at my home page and will release its source code. I’ll do the same with Ajax shortly.

After getting either of these online, it should be fun to add behavior to them. After all, using Flash for simple text based output is overkill. One thing to note is how this module can be deployed in any web environment without touching server side code. No PHP. No JSP. No Python. No Perl. Gotta love that.

We’ll see where it goes. Tinkering is fun 🙂

“the “sixth borough” of New York.”…

An insulting NYTimes article that shares the good news of folks from New York deciding that our town is the place to be has a tone to it that has a few of us Philadelphian’s more than a little pissed. One of which wrote a letter to the Times as Dan Rubin documents, others are blogging about it.

People moving *into* Philly is a terrific story. It’s one we should celebrate and look at causes for – which the article does to its credit.

People looking at Philly as an alternative to New York? Complimentary. Philly being viewed as a borough of New York? Insulting. Really fucking insulting.

The Business of Algorithms – Blogorithms

A must read: Burningbird: The Business of Algorithms – Blogorithms:

Algorithms are big business. Recently I’ve seen several jobs where the company wants someone who is “good with algorithms”. Microsoft is competing with Google is competing with Yahoo to hire the best algorithm wranglers (which evidently, according to the article, does not mean women). IBM is releasing it’s unstructured data architecture (UIMA), including it’s concept-based search algorithms into open source by year end. Even within weblogging the debate, and the race, is on to find the best algorithms to mine us, otherwise known as the higher income people without lives.

Suddenly, the hip and cool kids on the block can “do� algorithms.

With all this interest, though, is a lot of confusion and misunderstandings, starting with but not limited to, the very concept of algorithm – concept which is now taking on such mystical properties that those who can “do” algorithms are being vested with an almost god-like prescience. It is time, and past time, to put the brakes on the hyperbole surrounding algorithms.

Starting with the basics: what is an algorithm.

…Now that weblogging has established its credibility (i.e. can be used to make money) and there are millions of us (â€?over 14 million served dailyâ€?), the interest in creating algorithms to make use of all the rich, seductive unstructured data we generate is very strong. Understandably so.

However, unlike previous research projects such as Dr. Marr’s, current weblogging effort seems to focus on the algorithms rather than the goal. Because of this, we’re measuring every last bit about ourselves, but not coming up with anything useful. By focusing on the tools rather than the end point we’re mixing search with popularity, marketing with discovery, and then we’re throwing in a little structured data–just to make things interesting.

Sociology + marketing + data mining + statistical analysis = ?