On George Bush’s faith

…on Feb. 1, 2002, Jim Wallis of the Sojourners stood in the Roosevelt Room for the introduction of Jim Towey as head of the president’s faith-based and community initiative. John DiIulio, the original head, had left the job feeling that the initiative was not about ”compassionate conservatism,” as originally promised, but rather a political giveaway to the Christian right, a way to consolidate and energize that part of the base.

Moments after the ceremony, Bush saw Wallis. He bounded over and grabbed the cheeks of his face, one in each hand, and squeezed. ”Jim, how ya doin’, how ya doin’!” he exclaimed. Wallis was taken aback. Bush excitedly said that his massage therapist had given him Wallis’s book, ”Faith Works.” His joy at seeing Wallis, as Wallis and others remember it, was palpable — a president, wrestling with faith and its role at a time of peril, seeing that rare bird: an independent counselor. Wallis recalls telling Bush he was doing fine, ”’but in the State of the Union address a few days before, you said that unless we devote all our energies, our focus, our resources on this war on terrorism, we’re going to lose.’ I said, ‘Mr. President, if we don’t devote our energy, our focus and our time on also overcoming global poverty and desperation, we will lose not only the war on poverty, but we’ll lose the war on terrorism.”’

Bush replied that that was why America needed the leadership of Wallis and other members of the clergy.

”No, Mr. President,” Wallis says he told Bush, ”We need your leadership on this question, and all of us will then commit to support you. Unless we drain the swamp of injustice in which the mosquitoes of terrorism breed, we’ll never defeat the threat of terrorism.”

Bush looked quizzically at the minister, Wallis recalls. They never spoke again after that.

”When I was first with Bush in Austin, what I saw was a self-help Methodist, very open, seeking,” Wallis says now. ”What I started to see at this point was the man that would emerge over the next year — a messianic American Calvinist. He doesn’t want to hear from anyone who doubts him.”

…What, after all, is the nature of the particular conversation the president feels he has with God — a colloquy upon which the world now precariously turns?

That very issue is what Jim Wallis wishes he could sit and talk about with George W. Bush. That’s impossible now, he says. He is no longer invited to the White House.

”Faith can cut in so many ways,” he said. ”If you’re penitent and not triumphal, it can move us to repentance and accountability and help us reach for something higher than ourselves. That can be a powerful thing, a thing that moves us beyond politics as usual, like Martin Luther King did. But when it’s designed to certify our righteousness — that can be a dangerous thing. Then it pushes self-criticism aside. There’s no reflection.

”Where people often get lost is on this very point,” he said after a moment of thought. ”Real faith, you see, leads us to deeper reflection and not — not ever — to the thing we as humans so very much want.”

And what is that?

”Easy certainty.”

Ron Suskin, New York Times: 10/17/04

Bush AWOL As 250 World Leaders Reaffirm Women’s Rights

With the notable exception of U.S. President George W. Bush, more than 250 global leaders, including former President Bill Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, reaffirmed their commitment to a ten-year-old UN plan to ensure the rights of women around the world. (Yahoo).

I’m not surprised. Are you?

More on Sinclair

I respectfully disagree with Rafe and Jeff Jarvis. I do think there is something the government should do about Sinclair’s illegal campaign contribution to Bush, but not directly. I am too much of a free speech absolutest to want the government to censor anyone. What I want is the FCC to do is to do its job and stop enabling fewer and fewer corporations to control more and more of the public airwaves (Bill Moyers terrific series on the subject).

Bill in a dangerousmeta thread shared a terrific post by Jay Rosen on all this.

Post-war planning non-existent

In March 2003, days before the start of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, American war planners and intelligence officials met at Shaw Air Force Base in South Carolina to review the Bush administration’s plans to oust Saddam Hussein and implant democracy in Iraq.

Near the end of his presentation, an Army lieutenant colonel who was giving a briefing showed a slide describing the Pentagon’s plans for rebuilding Iraq after the war, known in the planners’ parlance as Phase 4-C. He was uncomfortable with his material – and for good reason.

The slide said: “To Be Provided.”

A Knight Ridder review of the administration’s Iraq policy and decisions has found that it invaded Iraq without a comprehensive plan in place to secure and rebuild the country.

…”We didn’t go in with a plan. We went in with a theory,” said a veteran State Department officer who was directly involved in Iraq policy.

WARREN P. STROBEL and JOHN WALCOTT, Knight Ridder Newspapers: 9-24-2004

Jon Stewart on CNN’s Crossfire

You are going to want to download this video of Jon Stewart on Crossfire (undergroundclips). Like Rafe, I first heard about this from a blog (for me it was scripting.com) and downloaded a version of it via a torrent many bloggers linked directly to. Like Rafe, I think Stewart looked pained, but for me, it was a delight to see hypocracy faced so directly.

Kerry wins the last and final debate

Who explained his positions better? Who was closer to the silent majority in this country who only speak during elections? Who looked Presidential? Who talked policy instead of attempting to sling mud and labels? Kerry. The polls are coming in and they agree with me. Bush now seems like an Osama Bin Laden denyer. He can’t help but lie to cover his tracks in his failure to bring him in. Next thing you know he will say that Bin Laden never attacked us and that Saddam did.

One thing that made me cheer was Kerry’s explaination of the role faith plays in his life and his views on homosexual marriage and abortion. “We are all God’s children.” Refreshing. There are those who use religion as a tool to point fingers at others and tell them to change. There are those who use religion to look in the mirror to ask “what is it I should do?”.

And like Garret, Ritalin did come to mind in watching Bush’s new demeanor.

More in Sinclair’s Bush campaign contribution

The Left Coaster has some information on how to protest this corporation effectively: challenge each of its TV station licence renewals.

A blog focused on boycotting Sinclair advertisers is up and comment threads are getting plenty of activity.

Josh Marshall shares his outrage.

Much more at Taegan Goddard’s Political Wire.

Folks, I just express how upset I am by this, or how upset you should be too.