I got involved in the campaign, in an active way, far too late to make much of a difference, but I?ve been trying my best to do what I can. Along the way, I?m learning a few things about rapid online community building, effective online communication, and most of all, being part of a team.

My initial, trepid step, was to join a Kerry in 2004 Meetup. Its meetings were being held at a local diner in Northeast Philly called Tiffany?s. I have many good memories there and knowing the location took away some of my anxiety. There was no need to feel that way, as I soon found out. The group was a friendly, diverse bunch with something that we all cared about to that made it easy to relate. Among us was a veteran of WWII, a few middle age housewives, three or so middle age men who?ve taken part in various campaigns in the past, and most notably, Ross Schriftman candidate for PA State Representative. Except for Ross, all had little political experience. Most of us were motivated by this particular election to act, since the stakes are so high. All were types I could share a seat with on the train or a bus. Typical Joes just like myself.

Our organizer, Lynne, would pass out a newsletter to keep us abreast of opportunities to get involved and important news that we needed to be keyed in on. After a discussion on each item, we would have open discussion on the campaign and on what new outrage had come out of the Bush administration. We had some terrific conversations, and having Ross there gave us a perspective we wouldn?t have had otherwise. One of the things that bothered all of us was the lack of communication with us by the Kerry campaign. A few were in Dean meetups and lamented how different it had been. The disconnect here was an opportunity lost. The energy we shared was terrific. People wanted to get involved and do something, anything, to help.

One of the team, a very bright 16 year old, had been working on a site for group, but it was under used. Our Meetup forum, likewise, had few posts, but I failed to notice. I offered my help. If, I thought, the software were easier to post to, maybe more folks would add news items regularly and we could have a solid news channel that would serve to bring others in. This was a mistake. I didn?t take into account how folks in the group used the net, because if I did, I would have realized the site was overkill. Email was the primary way they communicated, and it would remain so. In any case, it did give me the opportunity to become very familiar with Civic Space. For an average blogger, CivicSpace provides too many features and is too complicated to configure, but if you are planning a site that will have multiple contributors, that aims to be a Slashdot-style community, I highly recommend it.

Our meetings have changed, partly on my suggestion, so that that we can donate our time to a campaign. We moved into Allyson Schwartz?s Northeast Philly headquarters and now meet every Tuesday. The last three weeks our team has helped to send out mailers, and do phone banking. Tim Kearney?s headquarters is in the same apartment building, so we?ve tried to help there as well. Our numbers have diminished a bit, Lynne had a personal situation arise and she had to hand over our leadership, but we?re all trying to help in anyway we can.

If you are in Northeast Philly, and would like to help a worthy candidate win office, call the Tim Kearney, Joe Hoeffel or Allyson Schwartz office. If you are in the burbs, Northeast of Philly, take it from me, you want to help Ross Schriftman.

If you?ve taken note that I am leaning hard towards Democratic candidates, well, I am. All three legislative house of our government are one party right now. Witness the results.

Tomorrow I’m going to post about the work I’ve been doing for PA Victory and provide you with some information on how to get involved with the campaign to elect Kerry for President in these last few days. It’s a community effort and we all have ways we can help.

BTW – Kerry and Clinton will be in Philly tomorrow.

Let me share my own thoughts for once instead of letting a link do it for me. I feel, from the bottom of my heart, that Bush’s “true believers”, those with their bumper stickers, and who refuse to face facts, believe most news media to be untrustworthy. They feel it doesn’t speak to them, that it doesn’t talk their language, and worst, talks down to them. They feel it doesn’t address their concerns. They feel left out. Disenfranchised. History seems to be moving far too fast, or at least this explosion in media makes it feel so. They fear it. They fear change. They appreciate someone who sounds “straight up”. They recognize that as the sound of honesty, even while *we* may think of it as bluster. They recognize loud volume as strength, and strength is something to desire in someone you want to have protect you. They want to kick some ass. That comes back to volume. Speak like you mean it. They trust that. Gray areas? Nuance? Those are for girlie-men. Girlie-men can’t defend their goldfish let alone a country.

Let’s get something clear – people do not communicate the same way. We respond to tones, colors and words differently. The Bush campaign is playing the tune it thinks will reach out to its base. It recognizes their feelings and instead of repuditing them, it connects with them. It relates to their concerns, and says it will address them. It comes down to marketing. It’s that simple. If newspapers marketed themselves to the Fox News crowd – it would be a different picture. But by and large, most don’t. So it’s not about “truth”. It’s about Coke vs. Pepsi. There are some who drink one, those that drink the other, and the rest of us folk who really don’t give a damn and rather have a beer. What you’re witnessing is the result of the nichification of mass media and those who use it for exploitation.

Until there is a source of news that these folks feel they can trust, that shares stories with the same view of truth as yours, well…

…for those who don’t get it? That was explained to me in late 2002 by Mark McKinnon, a longtime senior media adviser to Bush, who now runs his own consulting firm and helps the president. He started by challenging me. ”You think he’s an idiot, don’t you?” I said, no, I didn’t. ”No, you do, all of you do, up and down the West Coast, the East Coast, a few blocks in southern Manhattan called Wall Street. Let me clue you in. We don’t care. You see, you’re outnumbered 2 to 1 by folks in the big, wide middle of America, busy working people who don’t read The New York Times or Washington Post or The L.A. Times. And you know what they like? They like the way he walks and the way he points, the way he exudes confidence. They have faith in him. And when you attack him for his malaprops, his jumbled syntax, it’s good for us. Because you know what those folks don’t like? They don’t like you!” In this instance, the final ”you,” of course, meant the entire reality-based community.

Ron Suskin, New York Times: 10/17/04

Robertson, an ardent Bush supporter, told CNN in an interview Tuesday night that he urged the president to prepare the American people for the prospect of casualties before launching the war in March 2003.

Robertson said Bush told him, ” ‘Oh, no, we’re not going to have any casualties.’ “

More than 1,100 American troops have been killed in Iraq since the invasion, most of them battling an insurgency that followed the overthrow of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

CNN.com – No casualties? White House disputes Robertson comment: 10/20/2004

It hurts. It just hurts don’t it?

Historically, Democrats have harmed Iran more than Republicans, said Hasan Rowhani, head of the Supreme National Security Council, Iran’s top security decision-making body.

“We haven’t seen anything good from Democrats,” Rowhani told state-run television in remarks that, for the first time in recent decades, saw Iran openly supporting one U.S. presidential candidate over another.

Though Iran generally does not publicly wade into U.S. presidential politics, it has a history of preferring Republicans over Democrats, who tend to press human rights issues.

“We do not desire to see Democrats take over,” Rowhani said when asked if Iran was supporting Democratic Sen. John Kerry (news – web sites) against Bush.

Yahoo! News – Bush Receives Endorsement From Iran: 10/19/2004

How ironic is that?

Congressional officials said mounting frustration with the agency prompted the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.), and the ranking Democrat, Jane Harman of California, to send a letter to the CIA two weeks ago directing the agency to deliver the report.

The existence of the letter was first reported by the Los Angeles Times on Tuesday in an opinion column by Robert Scheer. The column quoted Harman as saying, “We believe that the CIA has been told not to distribute the report. We are very concerned.”

Yahoo! News – Lawmakers request CIA’s 9/11 report: 10/20/2004

Sounds explosive. And it figures this would be suppressed until after the election.

Bush Relatives for Kerry. Is this real? Ouch that’s gotta hurt!

When you come down to it, Jon Stewart’s segment on Crossfire was actually sort of lame. He told the hosts that they’re playing into the hands of the politicians and corporations, but he didn’t tell them how. He called them hacks but didn’t explain in what sense. He said they were degrading democracy but not what an alternative might be. When people replay this segment in ten or fifty years, they’ll wonder why it mattered.

Nevertheless, I believe this was a seminal moment in the re-framing of the media. To be precise, the moment came when Stewart refused to be Tucker Carlson’s funny “monkey.” Now who’s the entertainer and who’s the seeker?

Joho the Blog: Stewart’s re-mastered narrative: 10/20/2004

The new at Sinclair Advertiser Boycott and at Media Matters looks promising.

Instead of showing the original, uncut, anti-Kerry Bush advertisement, they still plan on showing portions of it in a new “documentary”. You can’t blame me for being skeptical. And it looks like Josh Marshall is too.

Philadelphia Daily News: Republican operatives working to re-elect President Bush submitted last-minute requests in Philadelphia on Friday to relocate 63 polling places.

If so, according to the Bush team, you’re in the minority, and you don’t count.

… Mark McKinnon, a longtime senior media adviser to Bush, who now runs his own consulting firm and helps the president. He started by challenging me. ”You think he’s an idiot, don’t you?” I said, no, I didn’t. ”No, you do, all of you do, up and down the West Coast, the East Coast, a few blocks in southern Manhattan called Wall Street. Let me clue you in. We don’t care. You see, you’re outnumbered 2 to 1 by folks in the big, wide middle of America, busy working people who don’t read The New York Times or Washington Post or The L.A. Times. And you know what they like? They like the way he walks and the way he points, the way he exudes confidence. They have faith in him. And when you attack him for his malaprops, his jumbled syntax, it’s good for us. Because you know what those folks don’t like? They don’t like you!” In this instance, the final ”you,” of course, meant the entire reality-based community.

…The aide said that guys like me were ”in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who ”believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ”That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. ”We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

Ron Suskin, New York Times: 10/17/04