Digg’s top links lists

One of the things I find so great about Digg is that it lets you see the top links shared for today, this week, this month, last month, and this year. In addition to my personal aggregator, I visit the Digg lists everyday.

These lists are far more valuable to me then the Technorati Top 100 blogs list – not because they inform me as to what’s popular as an aggregate of all time – but because they give me choice of seeing that, or what’s being talked about right now.

Of course these lists are different then the A-list in another respect – they cover conversations and not publishers/personalities. It still would be helpful to have similar lists to see who are the up and comers – this week, this month, this year, and today – or see the most influential within a certain topic space.

I feel the Top 100 “A-List” causes so much concern and controversy because it has a slow change rate. By its nature it won’t track with the growth rate of blogging. It’s an “all time” list. It is self-reinforcing. Newer blogs have little chance to show up. Even if they are becoming as influential as those already in this list.

That’s one of Jason Calacanis criticisms of the Top 100. As a response, he is providing a $10,000 cash bounty to someone who will develop a new list he feels would be more useful. Check out his post and responses. David Sifri was among the first. NZ, of Truth Laid Bear, an implementor of one of the earliest forms of this list, hops in as well with ideas for ecosystem specific sublists.

Speaking of lists – I’ve been maintaining my own blogroll for ages. Most bloggers do. In addition I help maintain Philly Future’s list of best Philly blogs. And now, added to those lists, is the list of blogs in our Philly Ad Network.

Speaking of lists, Daypop’s Top 40 has been in fine form these past few weeks.

This discussion can depress me at times. But I admit I can’t help but be fascinated by it as well.

… Neon lights, A Nobel Price
The mirror speaks, the reflection lies
You don’t have to follow me
Only you can set me free
I sell the things you need to be
I’m the smiling face on your T.V.
I’m the Cult of Personality
I exploit you still you love me
I tell you one and one makes three
I’m the Cult of Personality

Living Colour’s “The Cult of Personality

“heard by whom Karl?”

Yesterday Jeff wrote a piece claming that: There is no A list. There is only your list.”. It was a thought provoking piece that I had to respond to. You just can’t deny its existance really. It’s there. A group of blogs who have considerably more influence then the rest of us. Given that influence by inbound links. And using that influence to spread what it feels is attention worthy. In my response I made clear I don’t think of this as some kind of clique or club like other bloggers do – just an expression of human nature taking form. It’s a natural occurance. Not a problem that needs to be solved. But something to deal with – even route around – if you need attention for something – feel that it is worthy – and the current group of attention influencers doesn’t care for it or see it yet.

In responding to me saying that: “Some would argue that the A-list, even if it exists, doesn’t matter. That thousands of D-list links can exceed the value in attention-driving a single A-list link can deliver. Indeed, I think this is true. However, the time it takes to be heard among so many can take much, much longer then what one related A-list link can do in a few hours. The difference can be astronomical and can’t be underestimated.”

Jeff posted this reply:

…heard by whom, Karl? If you want to be heard by an audience the size of TV Guide, then we’re all Z list. But then, TV Guide isn’t A list itself anymore either, is it? That’s the way the world is going: The mass is dead! Long live the niches!

We need to stop thinking in the old terms of mass market, big circulation, big ratings, blockbusters. That world is dying. We need to stop thinking that when we are in a niche, we’re in something lesser. No, it means we’re in a community. We’re in a good conversation, not a loud crowd.

I used to write for an alleged audience of 25 million at TV Guide and People. Now I write for an audience of a few thousand. Call that whatever damned list you like. I like it much better.

In his comments I replied:

…I’d answer – to be heard by folks who don’t already hear you – who you want or need to hear you.

We are definitely Z-list (all of us) in comparison to the TV-Guide’s audience. Good point. We are definitely in a niche. In many niches actually. You can sub categorize me till the cows come home (whenever that is) – but it makes no difference – there is still – for folks seeking and needing attention to for what they are doing – a struggle. And there is a way to judge ‘attention influence’? – even in this small niche we all work within here on the web. The most influential have been tagged with the term ‘A-list’?. Maybe it’s a derogatory term. I have no idea. I think term sucks. Makes it sound like a clique when I think it really isn’t. Not actively at least. DailyKos and Powerline are NOT part of the same club. They don’t chat everyday. But the existence of their influence – or yours – can’t be doubted. It can be measured. Itts there. Denying it doesntt make it go away. I’m not saying this is a problem – but a reality to deal with.

And yeah no matter what list or category you wish to put me in – I’m happy to be here right along with ya. The web is participatory – the major differentiator from what’s come before. It’s read *and* write. It’s two way. That makes all the difference.

Speaking of his comments, we’re having a great discussion there I think.

Happenings at Philly Future

The Missing Person’s Network idea is taking shape and resources are being found at Philly Future. Blogs as this generation’s milk cartoons. It can work.

Our Philadelphia regional ad network is up and running! If you are a blogger in the Philadelphia area looking to take part see the page for instructions. If you are an advertiser – especially a local advertiser – I can think of no better way than to get visibility among opinion makers and influencers in the Delaware Valley.

Every week or so we pick a blog in our region to feature – interview and post headlines prominently. This week it’s the fantastic Beerleaguer. Read Howard’s interview with Jason of Beerleaguer.

Wired mentions our efforts, but not our name, in helping to find Latoyia Figueroa and raise visibility of her among regional blogs.

Sen. Santorum: Birth Control is “Harmful” to Women

The American Constitution Society: Sen. Santorum: Birth Control is “Harmful” to Women:

Thursday evening on Comcast CN8, Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum explained on a talk show that he is “not a believer of birth control.”

From his point of view, he explained, “I think it’s harmful to women…and society.” Further, it has “harmful long-term consequences.”

Although Senator Santorum clarified that from a government perspective he has always voted in favor of birth control, he personally thinks it is detrimental. “It goes down the line of being able to do what you want to do without having the responsibility that comes with that,” he explained.

The conversation can be viewed here. Thanks to Echidne for the tip.

Sidestepping The Will of the People, Bush sends Bolton to U.N.

Oh yeah, I changed that headline. The Will of the People, the legislative branch of the government, of which, the Senate is part, was completely sidestepped in Bush’s mad dash to appoint Bolton to the UN – a move NO one thinks is wise. Imperial – don’t you think?

See CNN.com – Sidestepping Senate, Bush sends Bolton to U.N..

Reactions in Technorati – which seems overrun with support for Bush’s move. Democrats seem silent.