Day one of a yearlong test for Philadelphia schools

Philadelphia opens a historic school year today, filled with uncertainty as well as hope, as the nation watches whether aggressive new leadership and a bold experiment into private management can turn around troubled urban schools.

Who knows. Maybe we’ll get it together before we have children of school age? Read the rest at the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Party like it’s 1988

Roth lands. I think for a second that his knee has buckled, but he’s still standing. Triumphant. A warbling, electric hum resonates from the guitars, the synth fades. We raise our fists. Roth has won, but it doesn’t matter. We are thankful. We don’t want him or Hagar to leave. We don’t want to go home to our laptops and multidisc changers. You can’t find this on an MP3. Roth bows. It is over. His shape disintegrates as the lights fade. Then he is gone, and all that is left are the multicolored bulbs of the Ferris wheel, spinning around and around and around.

What’s this? Two Salon pieces today? Read this one on the Hagar and Roth tour.

Don’t watch, don’t listen

In other words, their employers knew exactly what they wanted from these guys. They got it, and only after it arrived with a bonus hailstorm of criticism, did they stop the show — but not the paychecks. The show was canceled because Infinity Broadcasting needed to protect its corporate butt; if local religious leaders and broadcasting critics had all been on vacation that week, the two idiots would still be making pooh-pooh jokes on the air as we speak.

Where is the reprimand against Infinity Broadcasting? (my emphasis) Or its mogul, Mel Karmazin? What’s his punishment? He hires “Opie & Anthony,” pays them to play with explosives, and when they blow things up, all he has to do is pay off the rest of their contract?

Read the rest of Keith Olbermann’s Salon piece. He nails it. That’s been my point. O&A are easy to point to and scream – “that’s wrong!”, but look behind the curtain folks. Look behind the curtain.

The Anniversary: A History Of God

Though most Americans take for granted that the crimes of September 11th were committed in the name of Allah, few have more than a cursory understanding of the Islamic religion itself, not to mention its long and complicated relationship with Western Christianity. And yet, if we are to make intelligent decisions, such understanding is crucial. This makes such excellent books as Karen Armstrong’s A History of God invaluable.

Armstrong is a world authority on the great monotheisms that originated in the Levant: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Her splendid History of God is the only book available that provides a thorough, readable overview of the theological, cultural, and political histories of these three religious traditions. She remains deeply respectful of her subject and yet never shies away from taking a critical or controversial stance. Her chapters on Islam are particularly fascinating, as Armstrong is clearly enamored with the elegance of Islamic philosophy, the grandeur of Islamic culture, and the beauty of Islamic art.

Given the breadth of Armstrong’s knowledge of religious history, she is particularly well-qualified to comment on the current rise, in all corners of the world, of religious fundamentalism, which she characterizes as a misguided reaction to the spiritual emptiness of modern life. (Her recent book, The Battle for God, is one of the best on the topic.) She ends A History of God with the following warning and advice:

Human beings cannot endure emptiness and desolation; they will fill the vacuum by creating a new focus of meaning. The idols of fundamentalism are not good substitutes for God; if we are to create a vibrant new faith for the twenty-first century, we should, perhaps, ponder the history of God for some lessons and warnings.

That’s what Powell’s Books had to say about Karen Armstrong’s A History Of God. I highly recommend it. Not a completely unbiased account (her portrayal is more critical of Christianity), but it is one which will help you to understand, in an easy to read book.

The Anniversary: The Rise of the Warblogger

Continuing my series on sites to bookmark related to Nine Eleven….

Minutes after the terrorist attacks occured a change swept many weblogs devoted to technology, which changed format and content, as new weblogs came online: all either to bear witness to the events on Nine Eleven, or provide commentary, news and analysis regarding it.

This pissed off many in the old guard. Either upset at the media coverage these sites would come to endear, upset that the sites that changed no longer webloged on technology as much, or changed character entirely, upset that many of the new sites were from the right of the political spectrum. Infact, I think only now, a year later, have weblogs with a left leaning bent, started to assert themselves, gain coverage, and weblog network. We need them. There needs to be a better balance.

These are the sites that come immediately to mind when I think ‘warblogger’:

InstaPundit, Matt Welch (who may have coined the word), KenLayne.com, Jeff Jarvis, Tim Blair, Andrew Sullivan, Eric Olson, lgf, Nick Denton

One guy builds version 1.0 in a few months and…

Here’s something I don’t understand. Ignore the Napster legal history for a moment. Let’s talk about software development. About two years ago, Napster and Bertlesmann announced that they would deliver a version of Napster that would charge money and only provide music legally. Now, it seems like they ran out of money before they could even deliver that. What I don’t understand, exactly, is why they couldn’t build this thing that sells Bertlesmann music with two whole years of work and a whole team of developers? When Fanning had built the original thing in three months? (Then again, the story here sounds incredibly familiar. One guy builds version 1 in a few months and then a team of 15 can’t build version 2 for years and years. Tell me you haven’t seen that movie before. (emphasis added by me – Karl))

Read Joel on Software. Telling it like it is.