Rock is dead, blah, blah, blah

Give this a listen:

Even if the belly-baring and exposed-thong set disagrees, Evanescence fans sure don’t. After years of none-too-coy Lolitas ruling the prefab pop realm, rocker girls have finally found someone strong and secure to admire.

“She’s not like Britney,” said Evanescence fan Stephanie Croks, 19. “She doesn’t have to get all slutty onstage and wear stripper costumes.”

Instead, Lee stomps around and pumps her fist in the air as any tough-guy frontman would. Her voice soars to operatic highs above the music’s ominous tones while Moody’s guitar comes on like a snakebite, puncturing the melody with precision then spreading distorted fuzz like so much crippling venom. The dichotic combination offers a fresh take on the played-out n?-metal genre, and it’s allowed the Little Rock, Arkansas, group to be one of the few female-fronted rock bands to hover near the top the charts in the last five years.

I am sooo tired of hearing rock is dead (via dangerousmeta). Every year it’s the same old song and dance.

If ever there was a “rock is dead” moment, it was Woodstock ’99. Attempts at pinning on the music were pointless since Woodstock ’94 was just as heavy, if not heavier. But the culture was certainly different.

Read Melissa of the “Deek and Melissa Show” (Boston radio) on Woodstock ’99:

The newspaper reports and news stories I’ve seen are claiming the violent behavior was a result of high prices. The rioting participants making, “anti-establishment statements,” spurred on by the bands who served as a backdrop for the event. That’s not the case. Unlike at Woodstock of ’69, the youth of today do not have a cause, even a cause as small as overpriced concessions at a really big rock show. The violence and outbursts were caused by boredom, by beer, by a small minority who did not feel the unity, and were determined to ruin it for those who did.

Was the experiment of Woodstock ’99 successful? I think it was. I think it brilliantly demonstrated the problems being seen in the youth culture of today. And once again, the parents, the media, the public, rather than saying they don’t understand, rather than looking for answers, are blaming the music. Woodstock ’99 was the voice of this generation. It represented beautifully a misunderstood youth acting out, and adult population exploiting that anger for sensationalistic headlines and pointing fingers every which way but at hemselves.

Rock survived. I believe the web will be the tool to set the rock musician and fan free. Music lives on far after popular trends come and go. Marketers have done their best at pushing one thing or another, but now the musician can deliver straight to the fan, and the fan can seek out what they want to hear. Now it’s the marketers are who are on the defensive because they are starting to get bypassed.

It’s a great time to rock.

4 thoughts on “Rock is dead, blah, blah, blah

  1. Popular formula these days.

    Have you noticed Pink using a band on stage and not lip synching these days.

  2. Haven’t been following her live setup, but I’m pleased to hear it. Any idea if they’re just “backing her up”, or do they do things worth listening to even when she’s not singing?

    Or better yet, can you point me to somewhere I can sample her live set?

    Speaking of representin’ Bucks County, yo ;-), apparently Justin Guarini was at my local movie theater this past Friday night, promoting his new movie along with fellow American Idol 1 winner Kelly Clarkson. No idea what the turnout was, as I had to get to our gig in Manayunk, but I imagine the rainy weather didn’t help.

Comments are closed.